Journal
NK cells, stem cells, peptides: how the main cellular methods differ
A map of cellular-medicine areas: how NK differs from stem cells, where peptides and plasma purification fit in — and why the choice of method is always the physician's.
NK, MSC, peptides, neuroregeneration, DFPP — to a newcomer it's just a string of abbreviations, and the methods are easy to confuse. Let's sort out how they differ.
This is an overview for orientation. Which method (and whether one is needed at all) is appropriate in your case is determined by a physician after diagnostics, by indication.
NK therapy — about immunity
NK therapy works with natural killers — cells of innate immunity. The logic of the area is to support the body's immune “surveillance.”
This is an immunological area: the focus is on cells that take part in natural defence.
Stem cells (MSC) — about recovery
Mesenchymal stem cells are cells with regenerative potential under active study worldwide. This area is more often associated with the processes of tissue recovery.
Unlike NK, the focus here isn't on immune attack but on the cells' regenerative and regulatory properties.
Peptides and anti-age — about regulation and ageing
Peptide therapy uses short protein molecules — participants in the fine regulation of the body's processes. Close to it is the anti-age area, linked to the processes of ageing.
These are “regulatory” programmes: they work not with a single tissue but with the balance of processes.
Neuroregeneration and DFPP — narrow tasks
Neuroregeneration is support for the nervous system's recovery processes. And DFPP stands apart: it isn't a cellular method but apparatus-based purification of blood plasma (double filtration) by indication.
These areas address narrower tasks and are considered in specific situations.
How not to choose a method “from an article”
The main takeaway: methods don't compete on a “better/worse” basis — each has its own logic and its own indications. Comparing them in isolation from a specific person is meaningless.
So the path is always the same: first diagnostics, then a conversation with a physician. All methods, described in detail, are on the site, but the final decision is made by a specialist.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
The question isn't framed that way. The methods have different indications and goals; there's no “most effective in general.” The suitability of a specific method is assessed by a physician individually.
Sometimes a programme may include several components — but only if justified by indication and decided by a physician. It isn't put together on your own.
With diagnostics and a consultation. They give the objective picture on which the options are then discussed.
Read next
Useful on this topic
Discuss your situation with a coordinator
Describe your medical goal — we'll advise which documents are needed for a preliminary assessment and what the next steps could be.